so let ‘s dig uncoiled into the juicy bits !
NVIDIA Ampere Specs, Performance, Pricing Leaked – Massively Faster Ray Tracing, Higher Clocks, More vRAM & Lower TDP vs. Turing
NVIDIA Turing GTX 1170 Alleged Benchmark Leaked, Faster Than 1080 Ti
just over two months ago we published the preliminary spectacles and expected performance out of NVIDIA ‘s GTX 1170 based on all the contemporaneous rumors and leaks at the meter and we labeled it a likely GTX 1080 Ti cause of death. If this holocene leak is to be believed then we ‘re indeed looking at a GTX 1080 Ti killer.
The GTX 1170 allegedly features a 256-bit memory interface paired with 16GB of GDDR6 memory and will run at a whopping ~2.5 GHz clock amphetamine which is outrageously higher than anything we ‘ve seen on Pascal and Volta, making it the highest clock graphics card we ‘ve ever seen to date, if this alleged leak is to be believed .
The card allegedly scored 29752 graphics points in 3DMark FireStrike, putting it ahead of NVIDIA ‘s GTX 1080 Ti and significantly ahead of AMD ‘s RX Vega 64. Based on these figures, we ‘re looking at a card that ‘s no less than 65 % faster than the GTX 1070, and no less than 38 % faster than the GTX 1080 .
NVIDIA’s Turing GTX 1170 Alleged Benchmark, The Devil is in the Details
There are several bolshevik flags associated with this “ alleged ” leak, and I say alleged because we ‘re not entirely confident in this “ leak ” to classify it as one, at this point in time it ‘s more so a rumor hence the rumor tag in this article .
The fact that what we ‘re looking at is a photograph of a sieve preferably than an actual screenshot or even better a 3DMark database submission makes this “ alleged ” leak suspect because it can be faked. All the “ leaker ” would need to do is take a screenshot of an ordinary 3DMark score, edit it with the GTX 1170 details that they want, display the edit visualize on the screen and then take a photograph. In fact, we ‘ve seen this demand method used in abundance to create juke leaks before .
AMD RX 5700 Series Selling Like Hot Cakes, AIB Sales up 100 % + The second bolshevik ease up is the fact that we were not able to locate this 3DMark entrance in 3DMark ‘s on-line database, although a careful tester could conceivably block 3DMark from creating an on-line entrance this “ alleged ” leak photograph shows a database introduction rather than an offline 3DMark benchmark run. An entry that does not exist on-line a far as we can discern .
The third red iris is the fact that the introduction displays the batting order as a GTX 1170, preferably than an NVIDIA “ generic VGA ” entrance as is usual with early graphics card leaks. It ‘s improbable that 3DMark would be able to correctly identify a GTX 1170 poster as a GTX 1170 ahead of the calling card ‘s launch and is much more probably to simply report it as a “ generic VGA ” NVIDIA card.
The fourthly and final red flag is the clock focal ratio. A ~2.5 GHz clock speed out of these chips is very unlikely, largely because we ‘re most probably distillery talking about 12nm silicon and even a 2 GHz clock speed out of the box would be affirmative .
At the end of the day we plainly were not able to verify the authenticity of this leak and even though the level of performance it reflects could very good be accurate we would urge readers to take it with the usual grain of salt associated with unverified rumors, which this very much classifies as .
With all of that being said, we expect big things from NVIDIA ‘s approaching Turing GPUs and would not be surprised if the approaching GTX 1170, or whatever NVIDIA might end up actually calling it, can deliver GTX 1080 Ti class performance or conclude to it. We ‘ll know for sure soon enough, american samoa soon as future month at Gamescom in fact, therefore stay tuned .
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Preliminary Specifications (UPDATED August 14th)
| Wccftech | RTX 2070 | GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Lithography | 12nm FinFET | 16nm FinFET |
| GPU | GT104 | GP104 |
| Die Size | ~400mm² | 314mm² |
| CUDA Cores | 2688 | 1920 |
| TMUs | 168 | 120 |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| Core Clock | ~1800MHz | 1506MHz |
| Boost Clock | ~2000MHz | 1683MHz |
| FP32 Performance (peak) |
~10.7 TFLOPS | 6.5 TFLOPS |
| Memory Interface | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| Memory | 8-16 GB GDDR6 | 8GB GDDR5 |
| Memory Speed | 12Gbps | 8Gbps |
| Memory Bandwidth | 384GB/s | 256GB/s |
| TDP | 140-160W | 150 |
| Launch | Q3 (September) 2018 | June 10 2016 |
| Launch MSRP | ~$499 | $379 $449 (Founder’s) |
